Twenty-nine-year-old Sarah had always been careful with money, especially after learning that she was going to become a mother. She and her husband had spent months preparing for their first baby, making a list of expected expenses and trying to save as much as possible before the birth. Sarah knew that raising a child would be expensive, so instead of spending every extra dollar on herself, she began putting money into a separate savings account specifically for the baby. She wanted to use the money for necessities such as a crib, stroller, diapers, medical expenses, clothing, and eventually other costs that would come with raising a child. The savings account represented more than just money to her. It gave her peace of mind and made her feel prepared for the responsibility ahead. Her family knew that she had been saving aggressively, but Sarah never imagined that one of her relatives would eventually expect her to hand over those savings for a completely unrelated reason.

The problem started when Sarah’s older brother, Daniel, found himself facing financial difficulties. Daniel had recently made several expensive decisions that left him struggling with bills and debt. He told Sarah that he needed temporary financial assistance and asked whether she could lend him some money. Sarah initially felt sympathetic because he was her brother, and she did not want to see him struggling. However, when she asked how much he needed, the amount shocked her. Daniel wanted a large portion of the money Sarah had saved for her baby. He argued that Sarah and her husband still had time to save more before the baby arrived, while his financial problems needed to be dealt with immediately. Sarah explained that the money had been saved specifically for the baby and that she was not comfortable using it for someone else’s expenses. Daniel responded that she was being selfish and that family members were supposed to help each other during difficult times.

Sarah tried to explain that she was not refusing to help simply because she did not care about her brother. She had worked hard to build those savings, and she and her husband had deliberately avoided unnecessary spending so they could be prepared for their child’s arrival. She also pointed out that Daniel’s financial problems were not an emergency that she had caused or created. According to Sarah, he had made several choices that contributed to his current situation, and she did not believe her unborn child’s financial security should be sacrificed to solve them. She offered to help him look for other solutions, such as creating a budget, finding ways to reduce his expenses, or borrowing a smaller amount from another source. Daniel rejected those suggestions and insisted that Sarah had enough money to help him. He reportedly told her that she would understand if she were not so “obsessed” with saving every dollar for her baby.

The conversation became much more heated when Daniel began involving other family members. He told their parents that Sarah had plenty of money but was deliberately refusing to help him. Their parents contacted Sarah and encouraged her to reconsider. They reminded her that Daniel was her brother and that family should support each other when someone was struggling. Sarah told them that she understood the importance of family, but she also had a responsibility to protect her own household and prepare for her child. She explained exactly what the savings were for and why she did not want to spend them. Her parents still felt that she should help Daniel, which made Sarah feel even more pressured. She began wondering whether she was being unreasonable for protecting money that had been specifically saved for her baby.

Daniel’s behavior became increasingly hostile after Sarah refused to change her mind. He accused her of choosing her unborn child over her own brother and claimed that she had become selfish since getting married. Sarah found the accusation deeply unfair. She explained that her baby was completely dependent on her and that preparing financially for the child’s arrival was one of her most important responsibilities. She also pointed out that Daniel was an adult capable of making his own decisions. She did not believe that being related automatically gave him access to money she had intentionally saved for someone else. Eventually, Sarah stopped arguing with him and told him that the answer was no. She said she loved him as her brother, but she would not give him the baby’s savings simply because he demanded them.

Advertisement

After the disagreement became more serious, Sarah decided to ask Redditors whether she had handled the situation correctly. She explained that she understood why Daniel was angry but felt that his financial problems should not become her responsibility. Many commenters immediately supported Sarah’s decision. They pointed out that money saved for a baby should be treated as money already committed to essential future expenses, not as spare cash that relatives can request whenever they need it. Several Redditors also criticized Daniel for trying to pressure Sarah by using family loyalty against her. Others said that if he had approached her respectfully and asked for a small amount that he could realistically repay, the conversation might have been different. But demanding a large portion of her baby’s savings and becoming angry after she refused was viewed by many commenters as completely inappropriate.

Sarah eventually realized that the disagreement had taught her an important lesson about boundaries. She still cared about her brother and hoped that his financial situation would improve, but she no longer felt responsible for rescuing him from every difficult decision. She and her husband continued protecting their baby’s savings and focused on preparing for the arrival of their child. Sarah said she had initially felt guilty because her family made her question whether she was being selfish. However, after hearing from people who were not emotionally involved in the situation, she became more confident that protecting her child’s future was not selfishness. She had created the savings account through months of sacrifice and planning, and she believed that saying no did not make her a bad sister. In her view, family support should never mean forcing one person to put their child’s needs at risk to solve another adult’s financial problems.

Read Story…

Give me the money you put aside for your baby because you might still miscarry

L

• Me
• Chris – my husband
• Lisa – Chris’ mum (my mother in law)
• Rory – Chris’ dad (my father in law)
• Kelly- my mum and the EM
• Tom – my brother and the ED
• Sean – my nephew.

CLARIFICATION: Kelly is mine and Tom’s mum, Sean’s grandmother. Tom and his wife, who isn’t relevant to this story, are Sean’s parents. This is intergenerational entitlement.

So 2 years ago I got pregnant for the first time. Chris and I told our families and Rory was overjoyed at the idea of a grandchild, and (at Lisa’s suggestion) gave me and Chris a check for £1000. He said this was to pay for a nursery and the rest should be kept safe until the baby was 18. Shortly after this, when I was at about 12 weeks, I had a miscarriage.

We tried to give Rory his money back but he asked if we were ever going to try again. We said someday, but not any time soon. Rory said to put the money in a savings account and add to it so when we do have a baby, we have the money for it. Chris and I agreed and after that we made the account, deposited the check, and tried to put in about £10 per week.

As it’s been 2 years of regular topping up the account currently has around £2500 in it. We’ve missed a week here and there but we’ve never taken money out of it.

Chris and I have both been to therapy and agreed to try again. I am currently 4 months pregnant. We waited this time until we were out of the “danger zone” (a period where miscarriage rates are higher) before we invited our families to our place and told them over lunch.

Everyone seemed really happy for us, except my brother Tom. I pulled Tom to one side and asked why the long face, and he told me that he knew about the baby fund and had been intending to ask me for it.

In the conversation after that, Tom said Sean is going to uni in a couple of years (he’s 16 now) and Tom doesn’t feel that maintenance grants (up to ~£7500 a year) will be enough for Sean to live comfortably. I said that Sean could get a job, and Tom said that he doesn’t want Sean working through A Levels, in case it affects his grades. Tom also said that he and his wife (who are both mid 30s) had Sean at the time when they would have gone to university so they couldn’t go, and because of this it’s important to them that Sean goes. He figured as me and Chris are on £10 an hour and Tom and his wife are on £9 an hour, this means that we automatically have money to burn.

I replied that the baby fund was, shockingly enough, for my baby.

Tom then said “I figured since you… you know… the last time, then this one isn’t a done deal yet”.

I told him no, Tom then immediately told Kelly how I was refusing to give him the baby fund, and now both Tom and Kelly are mad at me because “Sean needs the money and we’re family”. Sean did not even know Tom was asking me for the money, or that the money existed.

To this day the only people to ever contribute to the baby fund are Rory with his starter money, and me and Chris with our £10 a week and bonuses. We don’t even consider that money to be ours anymore, and even when Chris and I were in dire straights and really could have done with some of the money in the fund, we still didn’t touch it, because as far as we’re concerned that’s our baby’s money.

Turns out Lisa told Kelly about the existence of the baby fund years ago, as Kelly makes quite a bit of money so Lisa thought Kelly might want to contribute to the fund. Tom complained to Kelly about not having enough money, so Kelly told Tom about the baby fund and said “what’s the harm in asking?”

Tom and his wife have had 16 years to save up. Me and Chris have never taken a holiday, and they go on two per year and then when they realised they had no savings left they decided to try and take the money that the entire family knows is for mine and Chris’ baby, while telling me that there’s still a chance I’ll miscarry since I’ve already miscarried once. Also, they have a daughter who’s about 10 so like if I give my current baby fund to Sean and then start rebuilding there’s no way that 8 years from now they won’t ask for my new fund for the daughter. Neither kid is entitled and they could both really do with an out to get away from their crazy entitled parents, but if it weren’t for them then we wouldn’t even be on speaking terms with Tom rn.

Clarification: Tom has no relation to Rory whatsoever, neither does Sean. Also Sean didn’t know and has apologised on behalf of Tom and Kelly and has said he’s tried to save up before now but Tom has always found it and put it in the “holiday fund”.

Sarah Starts Saving for Her Baby’s Future

Twenty-nine-year-old Sarah had always been careful with money. She was not someone who believed in spending every dollar the moment she received it, especially after learning that she was going to become a mother. Sarah and her husband had been preparing for their first baby for months, and one of their biggest priorities was creating a financial cushion before the birth. They knew that babies came with countless expenses, from medical appointments and diapers to furniture, clothing, childcare, and unexpected emergencies. Because of that, Sarah began putting money aside whenever she could. She kept the savings separate from their regular household account and mentally considered it already committed to her baby’s future.

Advertisement

Sarah’s husband supported the plan completely. They both agreed that having money available before the baby arrived would make the transition into parenthood less stressful. They cut back on unnecessary purchases, avoided expensive vacations, and carefully tracked their monthly expenses. Sarah was especially proud of how much they managed to save without making themselves miserable. She knew the amount was not enough to cover every expense her child would ever have, but it was enough to give them a strong start. To Sarah, the savings represented preparation and responsibility rather than spare money. She had never considered using it for anything unrelated to the baby.

Advertisement

Her family knew that Sarah had been saving, although they did not know every detail of the account. Her older brother Daniel knew that she and her husband were preparing financially for their first child. At first, he seemed happy for them and occasionally asked questions about the pregnancy. Sarah never expected that Daniel would eventually become interested in the money she had been putting aside. The situation changed when Daniel began experiencing serious financial problems. He had accumulated several debts and was struggling to keep up with his monthly obligations. Instead of making a plan to deal with those problems himself, he decided to ask Sarah for financial assistance.

When Daniel first approached Sarah, she did not immediately refuse. She understood that people could experience difficult financial periods, and because he was her brother, she wanted to hear him out. Daniel explained that he needed a substantial amount of money to deal with his current situation. Sarah asked how much he needed, and the answer immediately made her uncomfortable. The amount he requested was a significant portion of the savings she and her husband had built for their baby. Sarah reminded him that the money had already been allocated to upcoming expenses and that they had worked hard to save it.

Daniel responded by saying that Sarah still had several months before the baby arrived. In his view, she could simply save the money again. He argued that his situation was urgent while hers was not. Sarah could not understand that logic. The baby-related expenses were not imaginary future problems; they were approaching quickly. Medical bills, baby supplies, and other necessities were already being planned. She also knew that unexpected costs could appear at any moment. She told Daniel that she was not comfortable taking money away from her child’s financial security to solve his personal financial problems.

Daniel became irritated by her answer. He accused Sarah of being selfish and told her that family members should help each other when someone was struggling. Sarah explained that she was not refusing because she did not care about him. She simply believed that helping a family member should not require putting her own child at financial risk. She offered to help him think through his expenses and suggested that they look for other options. Daniel was not interested in those alternatives. He wanted the money Sarah had already saved and seemed convinced that she had no good reason to refuse.

Sarah’s husband supported her decision. He reminded her that they had both agreed that the savings were for their baby and that giving away a large portion of it could create stress for their own household. He also pointed out that Daniel was an adult with his own income and responsibilities. While they could sympathize with his situation, they were not obligated to solve it. Sarah felt relieved that her husband agreed because she had already begun feeling guilty after Daniel repeatedly accused her of being selfish.

The disagreement became worse when Daniel involved other family members. He apparently told their parents that Sarah had plenty of money but was refusing to help him. According to him, she was choosing to protect her savings instead of helping her own brother during a difficult period. Some relatives encouraged Sarah to reconsider. They told her that family was more important than money and that she could always rebuild her savings later. Sarah found that argument frustrating because none of the people giving her advice were offering to replace the money themselves.

Sarah explained to her family that the savings were not money she had sitting around without a purpose. Every dollar had been saved with a specific reason. She and her husband had deliberately changed their spending habits to prepare for the baby. They had skipped things they wanted, delayed certain purchases, and put their future child’s needs ahead of their own. Sarah felt it was unfair for Daniel to suddenly decide that those sacrifices should benefit him instead.

Daniel continued pushing. He told Sarah that she was acting differently since becoming pregnant and that she had become too focused on her own household. He accused her of forgetting that she had a responsibility to help her family. Sarah was deeply hurt by that statement. She believed becoming a parent meant her responsibilities had actually increased. Her first priority was now making sure her child would be safe, healthy, and provided for. She did not believe that becoming a mother meant she had to stop caring about her brother, but she also did not believe caring about him required sacrificing her child’s needs.

Eventually, Sarah gave Daniel a firm answer: no. She told him that she would not give him the baby’s savings and that the subject was no longer open for negotiation. She expected him to be disappointed, but she was surprised by how angry he became. Daniel accused her of abandoning him and said that he would remember her refusal. Sarah told him that she was sorry he was struggling, but she could not allow guilt or family pressure to determine how she used money that had been saved for her child.

After the argument, Sarah started questioning herself. She wondered whether she had been too harsh. She knew that Daniel was struggling, and part of her felt guilty about having money available while her brother was dealing with debt. At the same time, she knew that giving him the money would create serious anxiety for her and her husband. She began wondering whether being a good sister meant helping no matter what or whether she had the right to draw a boundary when her child’s financial security was involved.

Sarah eventually decided to tell her story on Reddit. She explained the entire situation and asked whether she was wrong for refusing to give Daniel the money she had saved for her baby. She wanted honest opinions from people who had no personal connection to either her or her brother. She admitted that she understood why Daniel was upset but wanted to know whether his anger was justified.

The response from Redditors was overwhelmingly supportive of Sarah. Many commenters said that money saved for a baby should not be considered available family money. They pointed out that Sarah had not accidentally accumulated the savings; she and her husband had deliberately sacrificed other things to create that financial cushion. Several commenters said Daniel was trying to turn Sarah’s responsible financial planning into an obligation to rescue him.

Other Redditors focused on Daniel’s behavior after being told no. They said asking for help was not inherently wrong, but becoming angry and insulting someone because they refused was a major problem. A few commenters suggested that Daniel might have approached the situation differently if he had asked for a smaller amount or proposed a realistic repayment plan. Instead, he appeared to assume that Sarah’s savings were available simply because she had more financial stability than he did.

Some commenters also criticized the relatives who pressured Sarah. They argued that it was easy for other family members to tell Sarah to give away her savings because they were not the ones who had spent months building it. If Daniel’s situation was truly an emergency, Redditors suggested that the family could have worked together to find a solution instead of placing all the responsibility on Sarah. Several people asked why nobody else was offering to contribute money if they believed helping Daniel was so important.

Sarah said that reading those responses helped her feel less guilty. She realized that she had been allowing Daniel’s anger to make her question a decision she had originally felt completely confident about. She also recognized that saying no did not mean she did not love her brother. It simply meant that she had established a boundary around money that had a specific purpose.

There were still some commenters who believed Sarah could have offered more assistance. They argued that family members sometimes need temporary support and that Sarah might regret refusing if Daniel’s situation became worse. Sarah acknowledged that perspective but explained that she had already offered non-financial help. She was willing to help him create a budget, look for ways to reduce his expenses, and explore other options. What she was not willing to do was take money directly from the fund she had created for her unborn child.

Sarah’s husband also became more concerned about the long-term implications. He told her that if they gave Daniel the money under pressure, other family members might eventually expect similar favors. Their baby had not even been born yet, and they were already being asked to prioritize an adult relative’s financial problems over their own household. He believed that establishing a boundary now would prevent similar conflicts later.

Eventually, Daniel stopped asking for the money directly, although their relationship remained strained. Sarah said that she hoped he would eventually understand why she had refused. She did not want the disagreement to permanently damage their relationship, but she also did not want to apologize for protecting her child’s future. She believed that Daniel had every right to be disappointed, but he did not have the right to decide how she and her husband should spend their savings.

The experience also changed how Sarah viewed family pressure. She realized that people often use phrases such as “family should help family” without considering whether the requested sacrifice is reasonable. In her situation, helping Daniel would have meant taking money from a fund created specifically for a baby who would soon depend entirely on her parents. Sarah felt that there had to be a point where family support stopped and personal responsibility began.

Sarah ultimately decided to keep the savings untouched. She and her husband continued preparing for the baby and remained focused on their own financial goals. She still hoped Daniel would recover from his financial difficulties, but she no longer felt personally responsible for fixing them. She said she would continue loving her brother and would help him in reasonable ways when she could, but she would not allow guilt to make decisions for her.

In the end, the Reddit discussion gave Sarah more confidence in her decision. She learned that setting a financial boundary does not automatically make someone selfish, especially when the money has already been saved for a child’s needs. Daniel’s financial problems were unfortunate, but they were not Sarah’s responsibility to solve. Her savings had been created through sacrifice, planning, and discipline, and she believed she had every right to protect them. For Sarah, the most important lesson was simple: being a supportive family member does not mean saying yes to every request, and sometimes saying no is necessary to protect the people who depend on you most.